NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 versus 21.766
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 versus 19 July 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 versus 21.766 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 66.82 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 768
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 2,138 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- 1144x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 7 GB/s
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 versus 6332
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 versus 650
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 versus 20732
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 75.758
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 versus 843.503
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 versus 5.071
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 versus 301.168
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 8496
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 8496
- 3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 907 versus 305
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 768 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 2,138 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 7 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 versus 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 versus 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 versus 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 versus 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 versus 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 versus 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 907 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | 10079 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 35369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 907 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP107 | GP106 |
Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 | 19 July 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 487 | 356 |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1392 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.82 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 250 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7 GB/s | 8008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |