NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1127 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 6111
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 18734
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 73.733
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 792.44
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.888
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 200.825
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 7218
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 7218
• Around 88% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 162

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 66.82 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 650
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.338 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6332 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	650 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 162

Compare specifications (specs)