NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 73% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Environ 80% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 902 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 30.133
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 148.747
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 3582
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 3582
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 10 September 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 863 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 902 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 173.2 GTexel / s versus 77.76 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 768
- Environ 67% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,156 gflops versus 2,488 gflops
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 versus 843.503
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 versus 5.071
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 versus 24.676
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 versus 8496
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 versus 8496
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 173.2 GTexel / s versus 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops versus 2,488 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 versus 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 versus 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 versus 24.676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 versus 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 versus 8496 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1441.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 10 September 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 556 | 554 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 173.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
