NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 354.4 GTexel / s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
• Around 27% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2816
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 5,238 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 750 Watt
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18566 vs 7580
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 747
• Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67645 vs 43046
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 106.585
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 vs 1878.403
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 9.751
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 511.115
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 9143
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 9143

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• Around 45% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 11 GB
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.208 vs 25.833
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3716
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3357
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3716
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18566 7580
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	934 747
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	67645 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	205.837 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2406.499 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.591 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.833 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1002.573 511.115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15019 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15019 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 32085

Compare specifications (specs)