NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1304 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1442 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 354.4 GTexel / s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 10,329 gflops
• 7.7x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1430 MHz
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 15149
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 836

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 45% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 11 GB
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88910 vs 67670
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.937 vs 205.837
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 vs 2406.499
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.191 vs 19.591
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 144.928 vs 25.833
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1056.078 vs 1002.573
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16640 vs 15019
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 3716
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 3357
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16640 vs 15019
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 3716
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18598 15149
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	937 836
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	67670 88910
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	205.837 355.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2406.499 4858.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.591 25.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.833 144.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1002.573 1056.078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15019 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 22133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15019 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 22133

Compare specifications (specs)