NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1304 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1442 MHz
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 354.4 GTexel / s versus 322.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,340 gflops versus 10,329 gflops
- 7.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11008 MHz versus 1430 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 versus 15149
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 versus 836
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2017 versus 1 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1304 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1442 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 354.4 GTexel / s versus 322.8 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops versus 10,329 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz versus 1430 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 versus 15149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 836 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 235 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 45% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 11 GB
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88910 versus 67670
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.937 versus 205.837
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 versus 2406.499
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.191 versus 19.591
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 144.928 versus 25.833
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1056.078 versus 1002.573
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16640 versus 15019
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 3716
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 3357
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16640 versus 15019
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 3716
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 3357
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 11 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88910 versus 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 versus 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 versus 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.191 versus 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 versus 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1056.078 versus 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16640 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16640 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 | 15149 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | 836 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 | 88910 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP102 | GP100 |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 219 | 86 |
Prix maintenant | $826.98 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops | 10,329 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 354.4 GTexel / s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 235 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 15,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 11 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 484.4 GB / s | 921.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 352 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz | 1430 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | HBM2 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |