NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1704 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6422 vs 4979
• Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39479 vs 22636
• 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 1715
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2168 vs 1177
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1982 vs 1724
• 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 1715
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2168 vs 1177
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1982 vs 1724

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1035 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 334

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6422 4979
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	334 371
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39479 22636
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9780 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2168 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1982 1724
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9780 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2168 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1982 1724

Compare specifications (specs)