NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 1024 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 12.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6417 vs 504
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 3 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 64 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 vs 504 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 335
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 vs 335 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 | 504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | 407 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
Code name | N18P-G62 | G94 |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 437 | 372 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 64 |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 128 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 13 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 505 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |