NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 600 MHz
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8366 vs 6417
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 343 vs 335
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 39431
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10140 vs 9780
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1982
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10140 vs 9780
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1982
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 vs 6417 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 vs 335 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 vs 39431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 vs 9780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 vs 9780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 | 8366 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | 343 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | 68305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N18P-G62 | TU106 |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 437 | 325 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Transistor count | 10800 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs |