NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 600 MHz
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 600 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8366 vs 6417
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 343 vs 335
  • Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 39431
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10140 vs 9780
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 2168
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1982
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10140 vs 9780
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 2168
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1982
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Pipelines 2304 vs 1024
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8366 vs 6417
PassMark - G2D Mark 343 vs 335
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 vs 39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10140 vs 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3706 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10140 vs 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3706 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6417
8366
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
335
343
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39431
68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3351
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 6417 8366
PassMark - G2D Mark 335 343
Geekbench - OpenCL 39431 68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2168 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1982 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2168 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1982 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 645.647

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name N18P-G62 TU106
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 437 325
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1215 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Pipelines 1024 2304
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.599 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate 77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs