NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Intel HD Graphics 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 875
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 273
- 11.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 3519
- 9.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 1225
- 6.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 1363
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3259
- 9.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 1225
- 6.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 1363
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 48 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 vs 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 vs 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 vs 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3259 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 6000
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 267 | 1126 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 48 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
