NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Intel HD Graphics 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 4.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 49% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1485 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 21.3x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 48
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 8.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 versus 875
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 versus 273
- 11.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 versus 3519
- 9.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 versus 1225
- 6.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 1363
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3259
- 9.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 versus 1225
- 6.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 1363
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3259
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 5 September 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 48 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 versus 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 versus 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 versus 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3259 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 6000
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 8.0 |
| Nom de code | TU117 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 5 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 1126 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 48 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
