NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 342.7x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 180 Watt
• 150x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 10 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 150.103
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 vs 27.417
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11173
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3690
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3343
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11173
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3690
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15529 vs 7566
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 891 vs 389
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52474 vs 41946
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 vs 1844.67
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 10.683
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 644.054
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7534 vs 3668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7566 15529
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 891
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41946 52474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.899 150.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1844.67 2036.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.683 14.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.919 27.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.054 819.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11173
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11173
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3668 7534

Compare specifications (specs)