NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 109.29
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3715
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3357
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3715
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3357
• 10.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 352

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 vs 7539
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 380
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 41907
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 152.235
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 vs 1843.045
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 vs 10.681
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 vs 644.098
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 12180
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 10180
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 751
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 55838
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 178.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 109.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 787.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 352

Compare specifications (specs)