NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 vs 102.69
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3715
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3357
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3715
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10144 vs 7568
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 vs 389
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55409 vs 41946
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 151.899
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1940.024 vs 1844.67
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.167 vs 10.683
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 644.054
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 12180
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 12180
• Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4670 vs 3667

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7568 10144
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 753
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41946 55409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.899 178.926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1844.67 1940.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.683 11.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.919 102.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.054 802.026
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 4670

Compare specifications (specs)