NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 100 Watt
Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.919 versus 102.69
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3715
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3357
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3715
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3357

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	2 Apr 2020 versus 22 Nov 2019
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt versus 100 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.919 versus 102.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 versus 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 versus 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 versus 3357

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1350 MHz
Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1485 MHz
Environ 45% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s
Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 1024
Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10148 versus 7567
Environ 94% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 753 versus 388
Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55409 versus 41946
Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 versus 151.899
Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1940.024 versus 1844.67
Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.167 versus 10.683
Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 versus 644.054
Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 12180
Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 12180
Environ 27% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4669 versus 3665

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1530 MHz versus 1350 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz versus 1485 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	138.0 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s
Pipelines	1280 versus 1024
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	10148 versus 7567
PassMark - G2D Mark	753 versus 388
Geekbench - OpenCL	55409 versus 41946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	178.926 versus 151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1940.024 versus 1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.167 versus 10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	802.026 versus 644.054
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569 versus 12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569 versus 12180
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4669 versus 3665

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7567

10148

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

388

753

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41946

55409

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

151.899

178.926

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1844.67

1940.024

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.683

11.167

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

115.919

102.69

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

644.054

802.026

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

13569

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

13569

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3357

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3665

4669

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark	7567	10148
PassMark - G2D Mark	388	753
Geekbench - OpenCL	41946	55409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	151.899	178.926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1844.67	1940.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.683	11.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.919	102.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.054	802.026
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180	13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180	13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3665	4669

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Essentiel
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Nom de code	TU117	TU116
Date de sortie	2 Apr 2020	22 Nov 2019
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	274	270
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1485 MHz	1725 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1350 MHz	1530 MHz
Processus de fabrication	12 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)	138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)	8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.041 TFLOPS	4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1280
Pixel fill rate	47.52 GPixel/s	55.20 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	95.04 GTexel/s	138.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Compte de transistor	4700 million	6600 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
HDMI
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	1x 6-pin
Longeur		9 inches (229 mm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)		350 Watt
Largeur		Dual-slot
Soutien API
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	192.0 GB/s	192 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	128 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR6