NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 versus 109.29
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3357
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3357
- 10.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 352
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 22 Nov 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 versus 109.29 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- Environ 45% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 1024
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 versus 7539
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 versus 380
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 versus 41907
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 versus 152.235
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 versus 1843.045
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 versus 10.681
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 versus 644.098
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 12180
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 12180
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 1024 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 versus 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 versus 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 versus 41907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 versus 152.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 versus 1843.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 versus 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 versus 644.098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 versus 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 versus 12180 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 10180 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 751 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 55838 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 178.014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 1961.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 11.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 109.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 787.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 | 352 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU117 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 22 Nov 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 283 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
