NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
2634.1x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 2521
Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 225
4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 9809
4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 37.761
4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 388.248
4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 vs 2.428
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 38.889
4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 vs 151.016
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 3817
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3685
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3353
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 3817
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3685
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3353
3.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 979

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 Apr 2020 vs 12 March 2014
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7539 vs 2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	380 vs 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	41907 vs 9809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.235 vs 37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1843.045 vs 388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.681 vs 2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.607 vs 38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.098 vs 151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180 vs 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180 vs 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 vs 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3656 vs 979

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7539

2521

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

380

225

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41907

9809

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

152.235

37.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1843.045

388.248

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.681

2.428

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

115.607

38.889

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

644.098

151.016

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3656

979

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
PassMark - G3D Mark	7539	2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	380	225
Geekbench - OpenCL	41907	9809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.235	37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1843.045	388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.681	2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.607	38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.098	151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3656	979

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Code name	TU117	GM107
Launch date	2 Apr 2020	12 March 2014
Place in performance rating	267	896
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz
Core clock speed	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	640
Pixel fill rate	47.52 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	95.04 GTexel/s	36.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,155 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		DDR3 or GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA