NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 0 mois plus tard
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.04 GTexel/s versus 36.08 GTexel / s
Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 640
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 versus 2521
Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 versus 225
4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 versus 9809
4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 versus 37.761
4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 versus 388.248
4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 versus 2.428
3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 versus 38.889
4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 versus 151.016
3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 versus 3817
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3685
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3353
3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 versus 3817
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3685
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3353
3.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 979

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	2 Apr 2020 versus 12 March 2014
Taux de remplissage de la texture	95.04 GTexel/s versus 36.08 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 versus 640
Processus de fabrication	12 nm versus 28 nm
Taille de mémore maximale	4 GB versus 2 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	7539 versus 2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	380 versus 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	41907 versus 9809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.235 versus 37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1843.045 versus 388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.681 versus 2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.607 versus 38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.098 versus 151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180 versus 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 versus 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 versus 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180 versus 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 versus 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 versus 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3656 versus 979

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 50 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt versus 50 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7539

2521

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

380

225

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41907

9809

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

152.235

37.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1843.045

388.248

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.681

2.428

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

115.607

38.889

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

644.098

151.016

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12180

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8926

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8062

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3656

979

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
PassMark - G3D Mark	7539	2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	380	225
Geekbench - OpenCL	41907	9809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.235	37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1843.045	388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.681	2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	115.607	38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	644.098	151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3656	979

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Essentiel
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Nom de code	TU117	GM107
Date de sortie	2 Apr 2020	12 March 2014
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	267	896
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1485 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1350 MHz
Processus de fabrication	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	640
Pixel fill rate	47.52 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	95.04 GTexel/s	36.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt
Compte de transistor	4700 million	1,870 million
Noyaux CUDA		640
Performance á point flottant		1,155 gflops
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)		Up to 3840x2160
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2		Up to 3840x2160
Protection du contenu HDCP
HDMI
Support du signale LVDS		Up to 1920x1200
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	192.0 GB/s	80.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	DDR3, GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Configuration standard de la mémoire		DDR3 or GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA