NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 837 MHz
- Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 506.9x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 24530
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 62.027
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 1218.137
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 vs 5.835
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 36.842
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 vs 215.546
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 10176
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3356
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 10176
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3356
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 2901
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 19 February 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 837 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 vs 24530 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 vs 62.027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 vs 1218.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 vs 5.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 vs 36.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 vs 215.546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 vs 10176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 vs 10176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 vs 2901 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2688 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8194 vs 7539
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 649 vs 380
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8194 vs 7539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 vs 380 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 8194 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 649 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 24530 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 62.027 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 1218.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 5.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 36.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 215.546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 10176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 10176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU117 | GK110 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 19 February 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 267 | 422 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $2,054.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | 876 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 837 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2688 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 187.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |