NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 837 MHz
- Environ 70% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1485 MHz versus 876 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.04 GTexel/s versus 187.5 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 versus 24530
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 versus 62.027
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 versus 1218.137
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 versus 5.835
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 versus 36.842
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 versus 215.546
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 versus 10176
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3356
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 versus 10176
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3356
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 2901
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 19 February 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 837 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s versus 187.5 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 versus 24530 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 versus 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 versus 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 versus 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 versus 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 versus 215.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 versus 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 versus 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 2901 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- 2.6x plus de pipelines: 2688 versus 1024
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8194 versus 7539
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 649 versus 380
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2688 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8194 versus 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 versus 380 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 8194 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 649 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 24530 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 215.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 | 2901 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GK110 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 19 February 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 422 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $2,054.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2688 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2688 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,709 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
