NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 160 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 7442
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 6714
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 7442
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 6714
• 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 1242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 88% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1024
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 7539
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 380
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 41907
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 152.235
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 1843.045
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 10.681
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 115.607
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 644.098
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 12180
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 14119
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 746
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 71402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 217.04
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 3119.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 21.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 133.975
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 1141.283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 6714
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 1242

Compare specifications (specs)