NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 7442
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 6714
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 7442
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 6714
- 2.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 1242
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 7 January 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 1242 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 1920 versus 1024
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 7539
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 versus 380
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 41907
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 152.235
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 1843.045
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 10.681
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 115.607
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 644.098
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 12180
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 12180
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 1024 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 7539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 versus 380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 41907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 152.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 1843.045 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 10.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 115.607 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 644.098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 12180 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 | 1242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU117 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 161 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |