NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 7235
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 38863
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 9313
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3698
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3353
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 9313
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3698
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3353
• Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 3319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 7235
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 430
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 38863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 3319

Compare specifications (specs)