NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1063 MHz
• 558.7x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 37924
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 147.62
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 1791.761
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 vs 9.457
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 99.574
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 vs 523.29
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11409
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3698
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3341
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11409
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3698
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3341

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 vs 7539
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 391 vs 380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 9097
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 391
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 37924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 1791.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 9.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 99.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 523.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3341

Compare specifications (specs)