NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla P4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1485 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.04 GTexel/s versus 170.1 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 versus 37924
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 versus 147.62
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 versus 1791.761
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 versus 9.457
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 versus 99.574
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 versus 523.29
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 versus 11409
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3698
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3341
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 versus 11409
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3698
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3341
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 13 September 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s versus 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 versus 37924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 versus 147.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 versus 1791.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 versus 9.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 versus 99.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 versus 523.29 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 versus 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 versus 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3341 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1024
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 versus 7539
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 391 versus 380
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 versus 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 versus 380 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 9097 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 391 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 37924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 147.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 1791.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 9.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 99.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 523.29 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 11409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3341 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 13 September 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 349 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 7,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
