NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus AMD FirePro S9050
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD FirePro S9050 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 65% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 45% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 5500 MHz
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7871 versus 4901
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 571 versus 369
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.146 versus 68.324
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 6.491
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.209 versus 91.133
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 570.245 versus 344.551
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 7062
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 7062
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 7 August 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 5500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7871 versus 4901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 571 versus 369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.146 versus 68.324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 6.491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.209 versus 91.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 570.245 versus 344.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 7062 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S9050
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1463.376 versus 1315.075
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 versus 3715
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 versus 3358
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 versus 3715
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 versus 3358
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 versus 1315.075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD FirePro S9050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7871 | 4901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 571 | 369 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.146 | 68.324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1315.075 | 1463.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 6.491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.209 | 91.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 570.245 | 344.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 13032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 13032 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3585 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | TU107 | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 7 August 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 370 | 373 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 900 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Performance á point flottant | 3,226 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1792 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 100.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Longeur | 254 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 264 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |