NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1063 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 576 vs 389
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39403 vs 31511
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 569.916 vs 523.29
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3341
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3341

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8768 vs 7878
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 134.955
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 1294.279
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 8.756
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 vs 91.78
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 10959
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 10959

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7878 8768
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	576 389
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39403 31511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.955 147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1294.279 1791.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.756 9.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.78 99.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	569.916 523.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3341

Compare specifications (specs)