NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 6316
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 61432
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3718
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3355
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3718
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3355
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 61432 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61432 | 70535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 27566 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Place in performance rating | 200 | 165 |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 780M
