NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1247 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1546 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 295 Watt
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 791
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 195.478
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 2129.009
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 14.889
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 129.271
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 14744
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 14744
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 7 August 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1247 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1546 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 295 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 vs 195.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 vs 2129.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 vs 14.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 vs 129.271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14121 vs 12900
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 vs 61100
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 vs 926.614
- Around 57% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1669 vs 1061
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14121 vs 12900 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 vs 61100 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 vs 926.614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 vs 1061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 | 14121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 | 204168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 195.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 2129.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 14.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 129.271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1328.033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 14744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 | 1669 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 221 | 186 |
| Price now | $279.99 | $449.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | 41.07 |
| Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1546 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1247 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 295 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 12,500 million |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 279 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
