NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1247 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1546 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 295 Watt
- 6.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 versus 791
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 195.478
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 2129.009
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 14.889
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 129.271
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 14744
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 14744
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 7 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1247 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1546 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 versus 791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 129.271 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14121 versus 12900
- 3.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 61100
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 926.614
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1669 versus 1061
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14121 versus 12900 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 61100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 926.614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1669 versus 1061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 | 14121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 | 1669 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 221 | 186 |
Prix maintenant | $279.99 | $449.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | 41.07 |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 279 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |