NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs ATI Radeon HD 3850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M and ATI Radeon HD 3850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 668 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 10.69 GTexel / s
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 43 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 19 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 668 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec vs 10.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 vs 30 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850
- 2.9x more pipelines: 320 vs 112
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 427.5 gflops vs 308 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 393 vs 379
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 3085
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 3085
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 320 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 427.5 gflops vs 308 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 393 vs 379 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 3085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 3085 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | ATI Radeon HD 3850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 379 | 393 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | 30 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 | 3345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | ATI Radeon HD 3850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | RV670 |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 19 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1451 | 1453 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz | 668 MHz |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 308 gflops | 427.5 gflops |
Gigaflops | 462 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 112 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec | 10.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 208 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 53.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 1660 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |