NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 448 vs 2x 128
• Around 71% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 2x 512 MB
• 3.8x more memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3238
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3238

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

• 2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 41.0 GTexel / s
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 197 Watt vs 210 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3238

Compare specifications (specs)