NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec
- 3.1x more pipelines: 448 vs 144
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
- 3x more memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
| Launch date | 29 November 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 144 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops vs 339.8 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 732 MHz
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1280 MB
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 2133
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3333
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 2133
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 210 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1280 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 811 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12379 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GF110 | GF106 |
| Launch date | 29 November 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
| Place in performance rating | 879 | 880 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops | 339.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 144 |
| Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s | 10.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GX2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
