Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 41.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 14x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 210 Watt
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 29 November 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 41.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9.3x more pipelines: 448 vs 48
- Around 49% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 2475
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 2475
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2133 vs 958
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2133 vs 958
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2304
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 2304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1473 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | 4590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | 4590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4507 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GF110 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 29 November 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 800 | 802 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,311.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
| Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 41.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 210 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
ATIFirePro 2260 PCI
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4330
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4250
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
