NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 40 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,280 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 2174
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 462
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 506.712
• Around 56% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 711

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 134 Watt
• 187.5x more memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 vs 9482
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.836 vs 25.21
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.01 vs 2.026
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.787 vs 30.868
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 153.657 vs 51.009
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 vs 3426
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 vs 3642
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 vs 3242
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 vs 3426
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 vs 3642
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 vs 3242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3388 2174
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	465 462
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9482 14263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.21 33.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	561.43 506.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.026 3.01
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.868 49.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.009 153.657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 4524
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 14630
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 4524
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 14630
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1106 711

Compare specifications (specs)