NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 6870

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 50.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 134 Watt vs 151 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3383 vs 2209
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 464 vs 416
• Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9492 vs 4950
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 16.41
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.346

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870

• Around 46% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 768
• Around 27% better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,585 gflops
• 175x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 vs 561.43
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.514 vs 30.868
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 vs 51.009
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 vs 3426
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3642
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3242
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 vs 3426
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3642
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 2209
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	464 416
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9492 4950
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.21 16.41
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	561.43 857.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.026 1.346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.868 45.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.009 184.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 4238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 4238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3349

Compare specifications (specs)