NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 34.0 GTexel / s
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,360.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 vs 4 July 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 1,360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 796.7x more memory clock speed: 4780 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Pipelines | 800 vs 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt vs 134 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4780 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK106 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 4 July 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Place in performance rating | 810 | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 850 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 208 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 76.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 4780 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro M4100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
