NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 289
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 vs 8.832
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 0.935
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 3275
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 3275

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 November 2013 vs 30 May 2013
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 850 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	64 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	365 vs 289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.582 vs 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.254 vs 0.935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3478 vs 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3478 vs 3275

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
Around 63% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
400x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2004 vs 1753
Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7240 vs 4490
Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 364.463
Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.952 vs 18.386
Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.535 vs 23.499
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2663
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2663
Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 vs 545

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	55.23 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,326 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2004 vs 1753
Geekbench - OpenCL	7240 vs 4490
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	520.747 vs 364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.952 vs 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	43.535 vs 23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3188 vs 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3188 vs 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	759 vs 545

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1753

2004

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

365

289

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4490

7240

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.582

8.832

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

364.463

520.747

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.254

0.935

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.386

19.952

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.499

43.535

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2663

3188

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3478

3275

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3332

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2663

3188

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3478

3275

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3332

3333

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

545

759

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1753	2004
PassMark - G2D Mark	365	289
Geekbench - OpenCL	4490	7240
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.582	8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	364.463	520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.254	0.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.386	19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	23.499	43.535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2663	3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3478	3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2663	3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3478	3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	545	759

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK106	GK106
Launch date	27 November 2013	30 May 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$109
Place in performance rating	1044	1046
Price now	$144.81
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	16.05
Technical info
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	850 MHz
CUDA cores	384	768
Floating-point performance	812.5 gflops	1,326 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	768
Texture fill rate	33.9 billion / sec	55.23 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	64 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	2,540 million
Boost clock speed		863 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Height	4.38" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	5.70" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	One 6-pin
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.3	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB / s	64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128-bit GDDR5	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.0 GB/s	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
Direct Compute
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
Verde Drivers