NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 598 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 8.4x more texture fill rate: 33.5 billion / sec vs 4 GTexel / s
- 21x more pipelines: 336 vs 16
- 20.1x better floating-point performance: 803.7 gflops vs 40 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1526 MB vs 512 MB
- 14.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1746 vs 122
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 336 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops vs 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1526 MB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1746 vs 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1746 | 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6357 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF114 | G96 |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 980 | 983 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 336 | 16 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 314 million |
Gigaflops | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1526 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |