NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 9.5x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 5.8 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 120
- 7.6x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 174 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 13.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1998 vs 150
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 23 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s vs 5.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 120 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops vs 174 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1998 vs 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 vs 155 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1998 | 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 | 155 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7240 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.731 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK106 | RV635 |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 23 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1060 | 1063 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 863 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 725 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 174 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 120 |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s | 5.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 378 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers |