NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 48.2 billion / sec
- 3.2x more pipelines: 768 vs 240
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 622.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 236 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 81% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1107 MHz
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1998 vs 1285
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 59
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 2697
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 2697
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 16 June 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s vs 48.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 240 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops vs 622.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 236 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1107 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1998 vs 1285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 vs 59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 vs 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21396 vs 7240
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21396 vs 7240 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1998 | 1285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7240 | 21396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.731 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK106 | GT200 |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 16 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1060 | 1062 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $522.78 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 863 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1296 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | 240 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s | 48.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 236 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,400 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | 2-way3-way |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 141.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1107 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers |