NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs ATI Radeon 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and ATI Radeon 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 3.4x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 250 MHz
• 27.6x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
• 4x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 333x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1998 vs 6
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 163

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9100

• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1998 6
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	289 163

Compare specifications (specs)