NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 811 MHz vs 360 MHz
- 22.1x more texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
- 60x more pipelines: 960 vs 16
- 66.4x better floating-point performance: 1,530 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 33.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2794 vs 84
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 628
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 628
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 12 September 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 811 MHz vs 360 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 63.76 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,530 gflops vs 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2794 vs 84 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 628 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2794 | 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8652 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 628 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK106 | G84 |
| Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 12 September 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.99 | $129 |
| Place in performance rating | 854 | 857 |
| Price now | $177.99 | $92.75 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.67 | 1.17 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 811 MHz | 360 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,530 gflops | 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 63.76 GTexel / s | 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDFirePro V7900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
