NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs AMD Radeon HD 8850M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and AMD Radeon HD 8850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2516 vs 973
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9688 vs 7447
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 19.641
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 2.018
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 31.637
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 84.378
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 2286
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2795
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3323
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 2286
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2795
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3323
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2516 vs 973 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9688 vs 7447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 vs 19.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 vs 2.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 vs 31.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 vs 84.378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 vs 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 vs 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3323 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8850M
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 226
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 435.842 vs 388.248
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 vs 226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 435.842 vs 388.248 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8850M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | AMD Radeon HD 8850M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2516 | 973 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 502 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9688 | 7447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 19.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 435.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 2.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 31.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 84.378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | AMD Radeon HD 8850M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Venus |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 939 | 941 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |