NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs AMD Radeon HD 8850M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M und AMD Radeon HD 8850M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 44% höhere Texturfüllrate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Etwa 44% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,155 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2511 vs 973
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9660 vs 7447
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 19.641
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 2.018
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 31.637
- Etwa 79% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 84.378
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 2286
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2795
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3323
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 2286
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2795
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3323
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 March 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Texturfüllrate | 36.08 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,155 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2511 vs 973 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9660 vs 7447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 vs 19.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 vs 2.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 vs 31.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 vs 84.378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 vs 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 vs 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3323 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 8850M
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 225
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 435.842 vs 388.248
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 vs 225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 435.842 vs 388.248 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8850M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | AMD Radeon HD 8850M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2511 | 973 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 502 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9660 | 7447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 19.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 435.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 2.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 31.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 84.378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 2286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 2795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | AMD Radeon HD 8850M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | GM107 | Venus |
Startdatum | 12 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 939 | 941 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technische Info |
||
CUDA-Kerne | 640 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,155 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 640 | 640 |
Texturfüllrate | 36.08 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 725 MHz | |
Berechnungseinheiten | 10 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 575 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
7.1-Kanal HD-Audio auf HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP-Inhaltsschutz | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung von LVDS-Signalen | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD und DTS-HD Audio Bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | large |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 80.0 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertyp | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Standard-Speicherkonfiguration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |