NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus AMD Radeon HD 8850M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and AMD Radeon HD 8850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 25 GTexel / s
- Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 800.0 gflops
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2511 versus 973
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9660 versus 7447
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 19.641
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 2.018
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 31.637
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 84.378
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 2286
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 2795
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3323
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 2286
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 2795
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3323
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s versus 25 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 800.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2511 versus 973 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9660 versus 7447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 19.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 2.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 31.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 84.378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 2286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 2795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 2286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 2795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3323 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8850M
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 versus 225
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 435.842 versus 388.248
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 versus 225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 435.842 versus 388.248 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8850M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | AMD Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2511 | 973 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 502 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9660 | 7447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 19.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 435.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 2.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 31.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 84.378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 2286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 2795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 2286 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 2795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3323 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | AMD Radeon HD 8850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Venus |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 939 | 941 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 725 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8850M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile
