NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec
- 24x more pipelines: 1536 vs 64
- 15.9x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 679
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 vs 308
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3221
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3221
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 19 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 vs 679 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 vs 308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3221 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 122 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 954 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 | 679 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 308 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3221 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK104 | G94 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 3 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 773 | 775 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 19 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 505 million |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PureVideo HD | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
