NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 2,448 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3828 vs 3799
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 12813
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 vs 39.934
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 777.677 vs 705.616
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.631
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.196 vs 13.832
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.511 vs 78.867
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3679
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3679
- Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1611 vs 1466
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 11 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 2,448 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3828 vs 3799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 vs 12813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 vs 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 vs 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 vs 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 vs 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 vs 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 vs 1466 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 vs 333
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 4501
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 4501
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 vs 333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 vs 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 vs 4501 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3828 | 3799 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 12813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 11 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 755 | 756 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 823 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 420
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
