NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 993 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 102.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 2,448 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3828 versus 3799
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 12813
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 versus 39.934
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 777.677 versus 705.616
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 versus 3.631
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.196 versus 13.832
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.511 versus 78.867
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3679
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3679
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1611 versus 1466
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 11 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 2,448 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3828 versus 3799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 12813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 versus 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 versus 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 versus 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 versus 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 versus 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 versus 1466 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 versus 333
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 versus 4501
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 versus 4501
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 versus 333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 versus 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 versus 4501 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3828 | 3799 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 422 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 12813 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 11 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 755 | 756 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 420
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
