NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 14.4x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 1536 vs 48
- 26.3x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 16.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3814 vs 231
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 vs 53
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 6543
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1814
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1814
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 116.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 vs 231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 vs 53 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 vs 6543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1814 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 122 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 | 231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 | 53 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 6543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1814 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | GT216 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 7 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 737 | 1561 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 550 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 8.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 25.28 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon 630
