NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 66% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 3.9x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
• 3x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 95% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3817 vs 3121
• Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 9716
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 vs 26.223
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.015
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 3245
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 3245

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070

• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 330
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 908.754 vs 777.677
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.519 vs 38.196
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.344 vs 82.511

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3817 3121
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	330 462
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15023 9716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.273 26.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	777.677 908.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.914 3.015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.196 43.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.511 93.344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4501 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4501 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3351

Compare specifications (specs)