NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and AMD Radeon HD 8970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5347 vs 3876
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 vs 57.241
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 2521
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2595
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 2521
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2595
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 August 2015 vs 14 May 2013
Core clock speed 1024 MHz vs 850 MHz
Boost clock speed 1188 MHz vs 850 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 90 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5347 vs 3876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 60.473 vs 57.241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6803 vs 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3697 vs 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 2595
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6803 vs 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3697 vs 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 2595

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970M

  • Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 72 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
  • Around 26% better floating-point performance: 2,304 gflops vs 1,825 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 800x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 642
  • Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20899 vs 16715
  • Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1223.742 vs 758.865
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.78 vs 4.279
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.306 vs 29.738
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 268.643 vs 231.508
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 72 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec
Pipelines 1280 vs 768
Floating-point performance 2,304 gflops vs 1,825 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 807 vs 642
Geekbench - OpenCL 20899 vs 16715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1223.742 vs 758.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.78 vs 4.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 89.306 vs 29.738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 268.643 vs 231.508

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5347
3876
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
642
807
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
16715
20899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
60.473
57.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
758.865
1223.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.279
5.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.738
89.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
231.508
268.643
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6803
2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3697
3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
2595
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6803
2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3697
3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
2595
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 AMD Radeon HD 8970M
PassMark - G3D Mark 5347 3876
PassMark - G2D Mark 642 807
Geekbench - OpenCL 16715 20899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 60.473 57.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 758.865 1223.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.279 5.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.738 89.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 231.508 268.643
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6803 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3697 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 2595
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6803 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3697 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 2595
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 104 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 AMD Radeon HD 8970M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name GM206 Neptune
Launch date 20 August 2015 14 May 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $159
Place in performance rating 553 554
Price now $194.44
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 30.06
Design AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1188 MHz 850 MHz
Core clock speed 1024 MHz 850 MHz
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 1,825 gflops 2,304 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1280
Texture fill rate 49.2 billion / sec 72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 90 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 2,940 million 2,800 million
Compute units 20

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 No outputs
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 7.938" (20.2 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
SLI options 2x
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pins
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 105.6 GB / s 153.6 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.6 GB/s 4800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround
AMD Eyefinity
PowerTune
ZeroCore